Deploying Cloudflare Workers KV Namespaces: Edge Storage Without the Edge Cases
Introduction
For years, conventional wisdom said that stateful data and edge computing don't mix. You put your application logic at the edge for speed, but you kept your database centralized—accepting the latency hit as the price of consistency. Cloudflare Workers KV turned that assumption on its head by introducing a globally distributed key-value store that embraces eventual consistency rather than fighting it.
Workers KV is Cloudflare's answer to edge storage—a globally replicated data store that caches key-value pairs at every one of Cloudflare's 300+ edge locations. It's not trying to be a traditional database. It's a purpose-built caching layer that trades strong consistency for something more valuable at the edge: sub-millisecond read latency for hot data, anywhere in the world.
The architecture is elegant: writes go to a central store and propagate to edge caches on demand. The first read from a region (a "cold read") fetches from central storage. Subsequent reads in that region hit the local cache and return in microseconds. This tiered design means KV is optimized for read-heavy workloads—think feature flags, configuration, session data, or cached API responses that change infrequently but need to be accessed constantly.
What makes KV compelling isn't just performance—it's simplicity. There's no cluster to manage, no replication topology to configure, no consistency level to choose. You create a namespace, bind it to your Worker, and start writing keys. Cloudflare handles global distribution, caching, and resilience. The pricing model matches the simplicity: generous free tier (100K reads/day), then pay-per-operation beyond that. No provisioned capacity, no reserved instances—just usage-based billing that scales to zero.
But this simplicity comes with trade-offs. KV is eventually consistent, with propagation delays up to 60 seconds or more. It's not suitable for counters, queues, or anything requiring immediate read-after-write consistency. For those cases, Cloudflare offers Durable Objects (single-location strong consistency) or you look elsewhere. KV shines when you can tolerate a delay between writing a value and seeing it globally—which is true for more use cases than you might think.
This guide walks through the landscape of deploying and managing Workers KV namespaces, from quick prototypes with the Wrangler CLI to production-grade Infrastructure-as-Code with Terraform and Pulumi. We'll show how Project Planton abstracts these choices into a clean protobuf API that captures the 80% use case while staying out of your way.
Understanding Workers KV: What It Is and When to Use It
Before diving into deployment methods, it's worth understanding what Workers KV actually is—and what it isn't.
The Data Store Spectrum: KV vs. Durable Objects vs. R2
Cloudflare offers three storage primitives for Workers, each optimized for different use cases:
Workers KV: Globally Cached Key-Value Store
- Best for: Small data (up to 25 MiB per key) that's read often and written infrequently
- Consistency: Eventual (60+ seconds propagation time)
- Use cases: Feature flags, cached API responses, session tokens, configuration data, user preferences
- Anti-patterns: Counters, real-time coordination, rapidly mutating data, transactional workflows
Durable Objects: Strongly Consistent State
- Best for: Coordinated state, high-write scenarios, real-time updates
- Consistency: Strong (within a single object)
- Use cases: Counters, collaborative editing, WebSocket connections, game state
- Trade-off: Runs in a specific region per object (not globally replicated like KV)
R2 Storage: Large Object Storage
- Best for: Large binary files, bulk data, archival storage
- Consistency: Strong
- Use cases: Images, backups, video files, large JSON blobs
- Advantage: S3-compatible API, no egress fees
The key insight: KV is a distributed cache, not a database. It's the equivalent of putting a CDN in front of your config service. You get global read speed at the cost of write propagation delay.
Performance Characteristics: Hot vs. Cold Reads
Workers KV uses a tiered architecture that determines its performance profile:
-
First read (cold): Data must be fetched from central storage. Latency: tens to hundreds of milliseconds (comparable to a traditional database query).
-
Subsequent reads (hot): Data is cached at the edge location. Latency: sub-millisecond (comparable to in-memory cache).
-
Write propagation: Updates go to central storage immediately, but edge caches expire gradually over 60+ seconds.
-
Negative caching: Missing keys are also cached. If you write a new key after checking for it, that edge location may not see the new key for up to 60 seconds.
This means KV is a poor fit for write-heavy workloads. If you're updating the same key dozens of times per second, you'll hit rate limits and incur propagation delays. The sweet spot is configuration that changes hourly or daily but gets read thousands of times per second.
Pricing and Limits: Where the Free Tier Ends
Cloudflare's KV pricing follows a usage-based model with a generous free tier:
Free Plan:
- 100,000 read operations/day
- 1,000 write/delete/list operations/day
- 1 GB stored data
- Limits reset daily at 00:00 UTC
- Exceeding limits results in errors (not charges)
Paid Plans (Bundled Workers, $5/month):
- 10 million reads/month included
- 1 million writes/month included
- Additional reads: $0.50 per million
- Additional writes: $5.00 per million
- Storage beyond 1 GB: $0.50/GB-month
- No egress charges
Key takeaway: Reads are cheap (10× cheaper than writes). This pricing reinforces the design: KV is for read-heavy workloads. If your write costs exceed your compute costs, you're probably using the wrong tool.
The Deployment Spectrum: From Prototype to Production
Not all approaches to managing Workers KV are created equal. Here's how the methods stack up, from quick prototypes to production-ready Infrastructure-as-Code.
Level 0: Dashboard Clicks (Prototyping Only)
What it is: Using the Cloudflare web dashboard to manually create KV namespaces and manage keys.
What it solves: Nothing that can't be solved better another way. The dashboard is fine for understanding the UI and testing a concept, but it's manual, error-prone, and leaves no audit trail.
What it doesn't solve: Repeatability, version control, automation. If you create a namespace in the dashboard but forget to update your Worker binding, you'll waste an hour debugging why MY_KV is undefined.
Common pitfalls:
- Creating namespaces but forgetting to bind them to Workers
- Losing track of which namespace belongs to which environment
- Accumulating orphaned namespaces that quietly bill you
Verdict: Use it to explore. Never use it for staging or production.
Level 1: Wrangler CLI (Development Workflow)
What it is: Using Cloudflare's official wrangler CLI to create and manage KV namespaces from your terminal.
Example workflow:
# Create a new namespace
wrangler kv:namespace create "CONFIG_STORE"
# Output: namespace ID and wrangler.toml snippet
# Add the namespace binding to wrangler.toml
[[kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG_STORE"
id = "abc123..."
# Seed data
wrangler kv:key put --namespace-id=abc123 "feature_flags" '{"darkMode": true}'
# Deploy Worker
wrangler publish
What it solves:
- Rapid iteration during development
- Quick data inspection and debugging
- Bulk import/export of keys via JSON files
- Preview namespaces for testing without touching production
What it doesn't solve:
- State management (no tracking of what was created when)
- Idempotency (running the same command twice may fail or create duplicates)
- Multi-environment orchestration (you must manually track dev/staging/prod namespaces)
Best practice: Use Wrangler for local development and debugging. Create a separate namespace for each developer (e.g., myapp-dev-alice, myapp-dev-bob) to avoid conflicts. Use wrangler.toml environment sections to separate dev and prod bindings:
[[kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "prod-namespace-id"
[env.dev]
[[env.dev.kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "dev-namespace-id"
Verdict: Excellent for development. Not suitable for production deployments where you need state tracking and rollback capabilities.
Level 2: Cloudflare REST API (Custom Integration)
What it is: Calling Cloudflare's HTTP API directly to create namespaces, write keys, and manage lifecycle.
Example (creating a namespace):
curl -X POST "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/accounts/$ACCOUNT_ID/storage/kv/namespaces" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data '{"title": "my-kv-namespace"}'
What it solves:
- Maximum flexibility for custom tooling
- Integration into non-IaC workflows (e.g., Ansible playbooks, custom deployment scripts)
- Direct control over API parameters
What it doesn't solve:
- Abstraction (you're managing HTTP calls and sequencing yourself)
- State tracking (no automatic record of what exists or what changed)
- Idempotency (you must implement "create if not exists" logic manually)
Authentication: The API supports two authentication methods:
- API Token (recommended): Fine-grained permissions, rotatable, scoped to specific resources
- Global API Key (legacy): Full account access, not recommended for security
For KV management, your API token needs the Workers KV Storage: Edit permission at the account level.
Verdict: Useful for custom integrations or if you're building your own orchestration layer. For most teams, higher-level tools (Terraform, Pulumi) provide better ergonomics.
Level 3: Infrastructure-as-Code (Production Standard)
What it is: Using Terraform or Pulumi to declaratively define KV namespaces and their lifecycle.
Terraform example:
provider "cloudflare" {
api_token = var.cloudflare_api_token
}
resource "cloudflare_workers_kv_namespace" "config" {
account_id = var.cloudflare_account_id
title = "myapp-config-prod"
}
# Output the namespace ID for use in Worker bindings
output "config_kv_id" {
value = cloudflare_workers_kv_namespace.config.id
}
Pulumi example (Go):
kvNamespace, err := cloudflare.NewWorkersKvNamespace(ctx, "config", &cloudflare.WorkersKvNamespaceArgs{
Title: pulumi.String("myapp-config-prod"),
})
if err != nil {
return err
}
ctx.Export("configKvId", kvNamespace.ID())
What it solves:
- Declarative state: Describe what you want, not how to get there
- Idempotency: Running
terraform applyorpulumi upmultiple times produces the same result - Plan/preview: See what will change before applying
- Version control: Track infrastructure changes in Git with diffs, reviews, and rollbacks
- Multi-environment support: Reuse the same config with different variable values for dev/staging/prod
- Dependency management: Automatically create namespaces before deploying Workers that reference them
What it doesn't solve:
- The underlying limitations of KV (eventual consistency, single-tier storage, no multi-attach)
- Managing the contents of KV (keys/values are typically managed by application code, not IaC)
Terraform vs. Pulumi:
| Aspect | Terraform | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Maturity | Older, widely adopted, battle-tested | Newer, production-ready, growing ecosystem |
| Language | HCL (declarative DSL) | Real programming languages (Go, TypeScript, Python) |
| Cloudflare Support | Official provider, comprehensive KV resource support | Bridged from Terraform provider, equivalent coverage |
| State Management | Local or remote backends (S3, Terraform Cloud) | Pulumi Cloud or self-managed (S3, Azure Blob) |
| Strengths | Simple for standard use cases, huge community | Expressive for complex logic, native testing |
| Limitations | HCL less expressive than full language | Smaller community, requires runtime (Node/Python/Go) |
Which to choose?
- Default to Terraform if you want the most mature, widely-adopted solution with a large ecosystem.
- Choose Pulumi if your team prefers coding infrastructure in familiar languages or needs advanced orchestration (dynamic resource generation, complex conditionals).
Both are production-ready. The choice is team preference, not capability.
Verdict: This is the production standard. Use Wrangler for development, but always deploy to staging/prod via IaC.
Level 4: Crossplane (Kubernetes-Native IaC)
What it is: Using Crossplane (a Kubernetes-based IaC tool) to manage KV namespaces as Kubernetes Custom Resources.
Example:
apiVersion: kv.cloudflare.crossplane.io/v1alpha1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: myapp-config
spec:
forProvider:
title: myapp-config-prod
accountId: abc123
What it solves:
- Unified infrastructure management for teams already using Crossplane
- GitOps workflows (declare resources in YAML, apply via CI/CD)
- Integration with Kubernetes-native tooling
What it doesn't solve:
- Adds complexity if you're not already invested in Crossplane
- Cloudflare provider is less mature than Terraform/Pulumi equivalents
Verdict: Use it if you're all-in on Crossplane for multi-cloud orchestration. Otherwise, stick with Terraform or Pulumi.
Production Best Practices: Making KV Reliable
Managing Workers KV in production requires understanding its constraints and designing around them.
Namespace Organization: Separation and Naming
Pattern 1: Separate namespaces per environment
# wrangler.toml
[[kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "prod-config-id" # Production
[env.staging]
[[env.staging.kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "staging-config-id" # Staging
[env.dev]
[[env.dev.kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "dev-config-id" # Development
Rationale: Complete isolation. No risk of dev data leaking into prod. Easy to audit and monitor per environment.
Pattern 2: Separate namespaces per concern
Instead of one giant namespace, create multiple namespaces for different data types:
myapp-config: Feature flags and configurationmyapp-cache: Cached API responsesmyapp-session: User session tokens
Rationale: Easier to apply different policies (TTLs, monitoring) and clearer separation of concerns.
Naming convention:
{app}-{purpose}-{environment}
Examples:
- myapp-config-prod
- myapp-cache-staging
- myapp-session-dev
Must be unique within the Cloudflare account and under 64 characters.
Handling Eventual Consistency
Because KV propagates writes gradually over 60+ seconds, design your application to tolerate stale reads.
Strategy 1: Embrace staleness
For configuration that changes infrequently (hourly or daily), a 60-second delay is acceptable. Example: Feature flags that control UI elements. Users won't notice if a flag takes a minute to propagate globally.
Strategy 2: Version your data
Include a timestamp or version number in your values:
{
"version": 2,
"updated_at": "2025-11-08T12:00:00Z",
"dark_mode_enabled": true
}
This lets you detect stale reads and potentially retry or refresh.
Strategy 3: Use Durable Objects for coordination
For data that requires immediate consistency (e.g., counters, coordination), use a Durable Object to handle writes and synchronize state. Then write to KV for fast global reads:
// Write: Durable Object updates state and KV
await durableObject.increment();
await CONFIG.put("counter", value);
// Read: KV for speed, Durable Object for guaranteed freshness
const cached = await CONFIG.get("counter");
if (needsFreshData) {
const fresh = await durableObject.getCounter();
}
Anti-pattern: Don't build workflows that require reading your own writes immediately. If you write a key and then immediately read it from a different edge location, you may get stale data or a cache miss.
TTL and Expiration
Cloudflare KV supports per-key TTL (time-to-live). Use it for ephemeral data:
// Set a key with 1-hour expiration
await SESSION.put("user-token-abc", sessionData, { expirationTtl: 3600 });
Minimum TTL: 60 seconds. Anything below is rounded up.
Use cases for TTL:
- Session tokens (expire after inactivity)
- Cached API responses (refresh every N minutes)
- Temporary data (rate limit counters, temporary access codes)
Use cases for no TTL:
- Configuration that persists indefinitely
- Feature flags managed externally
- User preferences
Note: Project Planton's spec includes a ttl_seconds field to document a default TTL policy for a namespace. While Cloudflare's API doesn't support namespace-wide TTL, this field serves as documentation and could be enforced by tooling that writes to KV.
Monitoring and Quota Management
Workers KV doesn't provide detailed per-namespace metrics out of the box. You must track usage yourself:
1. Monitor at the account level:
- Use Cloudflare's dashboard or API to track daily/monthly read and write operations
- Set up alerts if you approach quota limits (e.g., 80% of free tier)
2. Instrument your Worker:
// Log KV operations for debugging
async function getConfig(key) {
const start = Date.now();
const value = await CONFIG.get(key);
const duration = Date.now() - start;
console.log(`KV read: ${key}, duration: ${duration}ms, hit: ${value !== null}`);
return value;
}
3. Budget for overages:
If you exceed the free tier, ensure you have a paid plan. On the free tier, operations fail after hitting limits. On paid plans, you incur overage charges.
4. Audit for orphaned namespaces:
Periodically list all KV namespaces and verify they're still needed. Delete unused namespaces to avoid unnecessary storage charges.
Common Anti-Patterns
Anti-pattern 1: Using KV as a real-time database
Don't use KV for counters, queues, or frequently mutating data. The write rate limits and eventual consistency make it unsuitable.
Solution: Use Durable Objects for high-write scenarios.
Anti-pattern 2: Storing large blobs
KV supports values up to 25 MiB, but large values increase read latency and Worker memory usage.
Solution: For large files, use R2 Storage. For moderate-size data (100 KB - 1 MB), KV works but monitor performance.
Anti-pattern 3: Assuming immediate consistency
Don't rely on reading your own writes within 60 seconds across all regions.
Solution: Design for eventual consistency or use Durable Objects for immediate coordination.
Anti-pattern 4: Committing namespace IDs to source control
Hard-coding KV namespace IDs in wrangler.toml makes it hard to manage multiple environments.
Solution: Use environment variables or generate wrangler.toml dynamically in CI/CD from IaC outputs.
Project Planton's Approach: Simplicity by Design
Project Planton abstracts Workers KV into a clean protobuf API that captures the 80% use case while staying out of your way.
The 80/20 Configuration
The CloudflareKvNamespaceSpec includes just three fields:
1. namespace_name (required)
- The human-readable identifier for the namespace
- Must be unique within the Cloudflare account
- Limited to 64 characters
- Example:
myapp-config-prod
2. ttl_seconds (optional)
- Default TTL for keys in this namespace (documentation/convention)
- Minimum: 60 seconds (enforced by Cloudflare when writing keys)
- Use
0or omit for no default expiration - Example:
3600(1 hour)
3. description (optional)
- Short human-readable description of the namespace's purpose
- Max 256 characters
- Example:
"Feature flags and configuration for MyApp production"
Rationale: These three fields cover the vast majority of KV namespace configurations. We intentionally omit:
- Network IDs: Not applicable to Workers KV (unlike compute resources)
- Performance tiers: KV has a single storage tier
- Access controls: Managed via Cloudflare API tokens, not per-namespace
- Replication settings: KV is globally replicated by default
- Quota limits: Set at the account level, not per namespace
This follows the 80/20 principle: expose the 20% of configuration that 80% of users need.
Default Choices and Opinions
Default: No automatic TTL
We default ttl_seconds to 0 (no expiration) because most KV use cases involve persistent configuration. If you need TTL, you can set it per-key when writing.
Opinion: Explicit naming over auto-generation
We require you to specify namespace_name rather than auto-generating it. This forces intentional naming conventions and avoids "namespace-abc123" clutter.
Opinion: Description as documentation
The description field isn't required by Cloudflare's API, but we include it to encourage teams to document their namespaces. When you list 20 KV stores in production, descriptive names and descriptions are invaluable.
Under the Hood: Pulumi for Orchestration
Project Planton uses Pulumi (Go) to provision KV namespaces. The implementation is straightforward:
kvNamespace, err := cloudflare.NewWorkersKvNamespace(ctx, spec.NamespaceName, &cloudflare.WorkersKvNamespaceArgs{
Title: pulumi.String(spec.NamespaceName),
})
Why Pulumi over Terraform?
- Language consistency: Project Planton's codebase is Go-based, so Pulumi Go fits naturally
- Protobuf integration: Easier to map protobuf specs to Pulumi resources programmatically
- Equivalent coverage: Pulumi's Cloudflare provider (bridged from Terraform) supports all KV operations
That said, Terraform would work equally well. The protobuf API remains the same regardless of the underlying IaC tool.
What We Don't Manage
Project Planton manages the namespace lifecycle (create, update, delete), but not the contents (keys and values). Why?
1. Scale: A namespace might contain thousands or millions of keys. Managing them in IaC state would be impractical.
2. Dynamism: Keys are typically written by application code at runtime, not defined statically in infrastructure config.
3. Separation of concerns: Infrastructure defines the container (namespace), application defines the content (keys).
If you need to seed initial data, use Wrangler's bulk import or custom scripts during deployment:
# Seed feature flags after creating namespace
wrangler kv:bulk put --namespace-id=$NAMESPACE_ID flags.json
Configuration Examples: Dev, Staging, Production
Development: Minimal Namespace
Use case: A developer's local sandbox for testing Workers with KV.
apiVersion: cloudflare.project-planton.org/v1
kind: CloudflareKvNamespace
metadata:
name: myapp-dev-alice
spec:
namespace_name: myapp-dev-alice
ttl_seconds: 300 # 5-minute default TTL for quick cache expiration
description: "Alice's dev environment for MyApp"
Rationale:
- Short TTL for rapid iteration (cache expires quickly during testing)
- Developer's name in namespace for easy identification
- No production data
Staging: Production-Like Configuration
Use case: Staging environment mirroring production setup.
apiVersion: cloudflare.project-planton.org/v1
kind: CloudflareKvNamespace
metadata:
name: myapp-config-staging
spec:
namespace_name: myapp-config-staging
ttl_seconds: 0 # No default expiration (persistent config)
description: "Feature flags and configuration for MyApp staging"
Rationale:
- No TTL (data persists like production)
- Clear staging designation in name
- Descriptive purpose for clarity
Production: Multi-Namespace Strategy
Use case: Production with separate namespaces for different concerns.
Config namespace:
apiVersion: cloudflare.project-planton.org/v1
kind: CloudflareKvNamespace
metadata:
name: myapp-config-prod
spec:
namespace_name: myapp-config-prod
ttl_seconds: 0 # Persistent configuration
description: "Feature flags and application configuration (production)"
Cache namespace:
apiVersion: cloudflare.project-planton.org/v1
kind: CloudflareKvNamespace
metadata:
name: myapp-cache-prod
spec:
namespace_name: myapp-cache-prod
ttl_seconds: 3600 # 1-hour default TTL for cache entries
description: "Cached API responses and transient data (production)"
Session namespace:
apiVersion: cloudflare.project-planton.org/v1
kind: CloudflareKvNamespace
metadata:
name: myapp-session-prod
spec:
namespace_name: myapp-session-prod
ttl_seconds: 1800 # 30-minute session expiration
description: "User session tokens and temporary auth data (production)"
Rationale:
- Separation by purpose (config, cache, session)
- Different TTLs for different use cases
- Easy to monitor and audit per namespace
- Clear naming convention:
{app}-{purpose}-{env}
Integrating KV with Your Deployment Pipeline
CI/CD Pattern: IaC First, Then Worker Deployment
Step 1: Provision KV namespace via IaC (Terraform/Pulumi)
# Create namespace in CI/CD
terraform apply
# Output: namespace ID
Step 2: Inject namespace ID into Worker config
# Generate wrangler.toml dynamically
cat > wrangler.toml <<EOF
name = "myapp-worker"
[[kv_namespaces]]
binding = "CONFIG"
id = "$NAMESPACE_ID"
EOF
Step 3: Deploy Worker
wrangler publish
Key insight: IaC manages the namespace, Wrangler (or Terraform's Worker script resource) deploys the code. Keep them separate but coordinated.
Wrangler + IaC: How to Avoid Conflicts
Problem: If you create a namespace with Wrangler, then define it in Terraform, Terraform may try to create it again (conflict) or adopt it (import required).
Solution: Import existing resources
If a namespace was created manually or via Wrangler, import it into Terraform:
terraform import cloudflare_workers_kv_namespace.config $ACCOUNT_ID/$NAMESPACE_ID
Now Terraform manages it.
Better solution: Choose one source of truth
- Development: Developers use Wrangler freely to create personal namespaces
- Staging/Production: All namespaces defined in IaC
Mark dev namespaces with a clear prefix (dev-username-) to avoid confusion.
Backup and Migration
Problem: KV doesn't support native snapshots or backups.
Solution: Bulk export via Wrangler
# Export all keys in a namespace to JSON
wrangler kv:bulk export --namespace-id=$NAMESPACE_ID > backup.json
# Import into another namespace
wrangler kv:bulk import --namespace-id=$NEW_NAMESPACE_ID backup.json
Best practice: Schedule periodic backups for critical namespaces (e.g., weekly exports to S3).
Key Takeaways
-
Workers KV is a globally distributed cache, not a database. It trades consistency for read speed. Design for eventual consistency from day one.
-
Use the right tool for the job. KV excels at read-heavy, infrequently changing data (config, feature flags). For counters or real-time coordination, use Durable Objects.
-
IaC is the production standard. Use Wrangler for development, Terraform or Pulumi for staging and production. Both tools are mature and production-ready—choose based on team preference.
-
Separate namespaces by environment and purpose. Don't mix dev and prod data. Don't lump config, cache, and session data into one namespace.
-
Monitor usage and set quotas. KV's free tier is generous, but exceeding it results in errors. Track operations and storage to avoid surprises.
-
Implement TTLs where appropriate. Use expiration for ephemeral data (sessions, cache). Leave config data without TTL.
-
Project Planton simplifies the API. Three fields (
namespace_name,ttl_seconds,description) cover 80% of use cases. Advanced patterns happen at the application layer, not in infrastructure config.
Further Reading
- Cloudflare Workers KV Documentation: How KV Works
- Wrangler CLI Reference: KV Commands
- Terraform Cloudflare Provider: KV Namespace Resource
- Pulumi Cloudflare Provider: WorkersKvNamespace
- Workers KV Pricing: Cloudflare Pricing
Bottom Line: Cloudflare Workers KV gives you globally distributed edge storage with minimal operational overhead. Manage namespaces with IaC, embrace eventual consistency in your application design, and use Wrangler for development velocity. Project Planton reduces the API surface to three essential fields, letting you focus on building edge applications instead of wrangling infrastructure.
Next article